Legal Opinion

State v. Holm

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 30, 1978No. 77 0863, CA 8842PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant challenges two conditions of her probationary sentence: (1) that she

"* * * shall submit her person, place of residence or vehicle to search and seizure with or without a search warrant at any time, day or night, whenever requested to do so by her Probation Officer, any person of the employ of the Corrections Division, or any Peace Officer”;

and (2) that she

"* * * is absolutely prohibited from association with any person who has ever been convicted of any crime, which includes the defendant’s husband, Richard Howard Holm * * * ”

The state’s initial brief contended that these matters…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. FogartyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. AgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State v. HovaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API