Legal Opinion

State v. Tays

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 16, 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUMMERS, Judge.

Appellant, Lindsey Keith Tays, appeals pursuant to Rule 37(b)(l)(i), Tenn.R.Crim.P. The singular issue presented is whether the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized pursuant to the warrant-less arrest of the appellant and the subsequent search of his vehicle. After the trial court’s ruling on the suppression issue, the appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a Schedule II controlled substance with intent to deliver or sell. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Craig Jones, an officer with the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. State v. MelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. Lemar J. White v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  3. State of Tennessee v. Darryl L. BryantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  4. State of Tennessee v. Donald MarbleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. State of Tennessee v. James Allen PollardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API