Legal Opinion
State v. Philips
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 8, 1986No. 14763-3-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ringold, A.C.J.
—Four codefendants, Eugene Montgomery, Gordon Thompson, Roberta Philips and William Smith, appeal the judgments and sentences imposed after a jury found them guilty of violation of The Securities Act of Washington, RCW 21.20. We have considered the numerous issues presented by the defendants and find no error.
In August 1981, Eugene Montgomery and Gordon Thompson formed Sea-Tac Mortgage, Inc. Their intent was to broker institutional and private loans. Thompson and Montgomery were both officers in Sea-Tac, but they were also involved in arranging some loan transactions.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,494 Great Western Bank & Trust v. Sol KotzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PhilipsWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Aventa Learning, Inc. v. K12, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- State v. HornbeckNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008