Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1928No. 7889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The suit was for foreclosure of a junior vendor’s lien against a tract of land in Cameron county, the prior lien having been, previously foreclosed against all parties at interest, including the junior lienholder.

The first lien notes were owned by A. Pitt, and the second by O. W. Kerr. In September, 1922, Pitt brought suit- for debt and foreclosure against the maker of the first lien notes and to foreclose against and conclude Kerr as the holder of the second lien notes. Kerr, cited by publication, defaulted, and was represented by an attorney appointed by the court, as required by statute.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Birke v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Allison v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Conner v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. TwichellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Kerr v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Person v. LevensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. State of Tennessee Ex Rel. David Jonathan Tulis v. Bill Lee, Governor of Tennessee EtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API