Micco v. Huser

In my opinion the fact situation here involved is so different from the facts of the cases upon which the majority opinion rests, that those cases are not authority for the conclusion reached in the majority opinion.

The facts here are that on March 23, 1938, proceedings for the appointment of a guardian for the said Peter Micco, an alleged incompetent, were duly and regularly instituted in the county court of Okfuskee county, and notice of the hearing thereof was duly served upon Micco according to law (sec. 1445, O. S. 1931, 58 Okla. Stat. Ann. see. 851). When the petition was filed and the…