Legal Opinion

Finance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Charleston, C. & C. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided February 25, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

This is a motion for the appointment of a permanent receiver for the defendant railroad company. At the outset, upon the filing of the bill, it was absolutely necessary, in the interest of the creditors and mortgagees of the- defendant company, to appoint a receiver immediately. The railroad extended over three states, and passed through several counties in each, where courts were in existence, having jurisdiction to adjudicate claims arising within their territorial limits. Manifestly, it was of the utmost importance that the control of the line should .be in one place and under one…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Trust Co. of New York v. National Land Imp. & Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1893
  2. Coy v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
  3. Williams v. United Wireless Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API