Legal Opinion

Cobban v. Northern Wisconsin State Fair Ass'n

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 9, 1933 :

Nelson, J.

Chippewa county first contends that the court had no power to modify its judgment after the term at which it was rendered unless specifically authorized by statute so to do. In support of its contention the following authorities and statutes are cited: Salter v. Hilgen, 40 Wis. 363; Pier v. Amory, 40 Wis. 571; Williams v. Hayes, 68 Wis. 248, 32 N. W. 44; Turner v. Nachtsheim, 71 Wis. 16, 36 N. W. 637; Laugesen v. Sanford, 135 Wis. 252, 115 N. W. 308; Fischbeck v. Mielenz, 162 Wis. 12, 154 N. W. 701; Kuether v. State, 174 Wis. 538, 183 N.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Salter v. HilgenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Fischbeck v. MielenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Williams v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Turner v. NachtsheimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koonz v. Joint School District No. 4Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Town of Wolf River v. Wisconsin Michigan Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API