Coco-Cola Co. v. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas; Frank A. Youmans, Judge. Action by John M. Moore and others against the Coco-Cola Company. To review judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
AMIDON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Moore et al., sued defendant, Coco-Cola Company, to recover compensation as attorneys. The case has been here before, and was reversed because of improper rulings on questions of evidence. 246 Fed. 942, 159 C. C. A. 214. It was again tried and comes here now upon the same class of errors, namely, rulings upon the receipt or rejection of evidence.
[1J On the former review the brief of the plaintiff in error, the Coco-Cola Company, contained no specification of the errors relied upon, as required by our rule 24. 188 Fed. xvi, 109 C. C. A. xvi.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. PomeroyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. LindemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. North American Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Bowling v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Hart v. VidalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lane v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Perkins v. BlakeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Fraser v. CrounseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Washington Tug & Barge Co. v. Weyerhauser Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co. v. HowesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932