Legal Opinion

Juba v. General Builders Supply Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, appellant moved, under subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike the affirmative defense from respondent’s answer as insufficient in law. The defense is to the effect that the appellant is not the real party in interest, his cause of action against a third person having been assigned by operation of statute on September 2, 1950, as provided by section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (as amd. by L. 1947, ehs. 9, 144, and as it existed prior *892to amendment by L. 1951, eh. 527). The motion was denied. Order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olker v. SalomoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Olker v. SalomoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peritore v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Juba v. General Builders Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API