Legal Opinion
McDORMAN v. Smith
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 14, 2006No. 05 C 0448PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Kimberly McDorman (“McDorman”) and Joseph Piekielko (“Piekielko”) have filed a thirteen-count corrected third amended complaint 1 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. Plaintiffs allege that McDorman was seriously injured when the car she was driving, which is co-owned by Piekielko 2 , was struck by a vehicle driven by defendant Michael Sanchez (“Sanchez”), an off-duty Chicago Police Department (“CPD”) officer. Plaintiffs allege that Sanchez was intoxicated at the time of the accident. Plaintiffs also allege that pursuant to a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- C.A. Brokaw v. Mercer County, James Brokaw, Weir BrokawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Black v. LittlejohnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Koen v. Southern Seven Health DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
- Koen v. Southern Seven Health DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023