Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Safford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Lyon District Court. Action brought by Safford against Tyler and another, on An attachment undertaking. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, April 1, 1883, for $285.73. Defendants allege error, and bring the case here. The facts appear in Tyler v. Safford, 24 Kas. 580, et seq., and in the opinion, infra.

1Opinion of the Court

*609The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action on an attachment undertaking. The facts are these: On November 28, 1879, Tyler, one of the present plaintiffs in error, commenced an action of attachment in the district court of Butler county against the present defendant in error, and caused certain property to be attached. Shotwell, the other plaintiff in error, was surety on the undertaking in the attachment. Thereafter, on motion, the attachment was dissolved by the district judge, and on error to this court his ruling was sustained. (24 Kas. 580.) For further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tyler v. SaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winstead v. HulmeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Parish v. Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Jewell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Adams v. GillamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Adair v. James M. Peterson BankUtah Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API