Legal Opinion

Meinhard, Schaul & Co. v. Folsom Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 20, 1907No. 362PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint, from city court of Moultrie — Judge Shipp. December 5, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The plaintiffs in error filed a petition against .Folsom Brothers as a partnership, to recover the sum of $20'0, which they alleged was due to them on an oral promise made December 12, 1905. The defendants had been adjudged bankrupts on a voluntary petition. A composition proposed by them was confirmed by his honor Judge Emory Speer of the southern district of Georgia, on the same day that the promise to pay the $200 is-alleged to have been made. Attached to' the petition, as a part thereof, is a statement of account evidencing a prior indebtedness by the defendants to the plaintiffs and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwindleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Moore v. TrounstineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Weatherly v. HardmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perfected Curing & Storage Co. v. First Nat. Bank of WinfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API