Legal Opinion

Murray v. Gibson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 16, 1854PublishedCited by 47 opinions

This case came up from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi, upon a certificate of division in opinion between the judges thereof. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daniel

The question adjourned for our consideration on this record, cannot be more clearly or succinctly disclosed than it has been by the certified statement of the pleadings upon which the judges of the Circuit Court were divided in opinion. That statement is in the following words :

May Term, 1851.

“ This day came on this cause for trial before Judges Peter V. Daniel and Samuel J. Gholson, presiding.
“ The declaration is an action of debt, brought on the 16th May¿ 1850, and founded on a judgment rendered on the 29th day of November, 1844, in the- district court of the parish - of Madison, in the…

2Cited by47 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Joseph Zicarelli v. Christopher Dietz, Chairman, New Jersey Parole Board and Sally G. Carroll, Associate Member, New Jersey Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API