Legal Opinion
Homestake Mining Co. v. Washington Public Power Supply System
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 20, 1979No. C-76-1238-CBRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
RENFREW, District Judge.
In this action the Court is being asked to interpret a contract involving the sale of approximately 1.5 million pounds of uranium octoxide, U3O3. Plaintiff is Home-stake Mining Company (“Homestake”), a California corporation engaged in the sale of uranium. Defendant is Washington Public Power Supply System (“WPPSS”), a consortium of public utilities operating in the state of Washington. Subject matter jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The parties have agreed that their contract should be interpreted in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Jacoby v. Grays Harbor Chair & Mfg. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Propane Industrial, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Homestake Mining Co. v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Homestake Mining Company, a Corporation v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981