Legal Opinion

Jelsma, Co. Treas. v. Butler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1920No. 11207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Logan County; Arthur R. Swank, judge. Quo warranto and injunction by C. 6. Butler and others against Lawrence Jelsma, County Treasurer, and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCollier, J.

This is an action of quo warranto instituted by the defendants in error, hereinafter designated plaintiffs, against the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter designated defendants, and to enjoin Lawrence Jelsma, county treasurer, from paying certain designated school warrants.

The case was tried below upon the pleadings and upon agreed statement of facts. The pleadings are as follows:

(Omitting the caption.)

“Petition.
“To the Honorable Arthur R. Swank, Judge of the Eleventh Judicial District of Oklahoma.
“Your relators respectfully show and represent to the court: (1) That they are citizens of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ward v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Cory v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State ex rel. Stoutmeyer v. DuffyNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Maddox v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  5. People Ex Rel. Cisco v. . School BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ervin v. SeikelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API