Legal Opinion

Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1974No. 74-1843Published

1Per curiam

This is the second appearance of this legal malpractice case in this court. On the former appeal, 471 F.2d 840 (5th Cir. 1972), we reversed and remanded an order of the district court, 344 F.Supp. 555, granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee because we felt that the facts with respect to negligence and proximate cause had not been sufficiently developed to support summary judgment. Upon remand the district court held a full evidentiary hearing and made detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. After careful consideration of the briefs, trial record and the opinion and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1973
  2. Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API