Legal Opinion

Hill v. Lester

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1936No. 13319Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

We do not believe that the conclusions reached by us on original hearing are in conflict with the numerous decisions cited by appellants, with chief stress on Wear v. McCallum, 119 Tex. 473, 33 S.W.(2d) 723, and Maytag Southwestern Co. v. Thornton, 20 S.W.(2d) 383, Court of Civil Appeals (writ of error refused). And, in addition to the. numerous decisions cited in support of the rule announced in 25 Tex.Jur. § 194, p. 597, quoted in our original opinion, we believe the following decisions are particularly in point: Morris v. National Cash Register Co., 44 S.W.(2d) 433,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wear v. McCallumTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Maytag Southwestern Co. v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Hickman v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Dallas Development Co. v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Morris v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API