Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perkins v. Croman, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2000No. 25525Published

1DissentJustice Schroeder

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which allows Perkins temporary disability benefits for the period from October 16,1996, through March 19,1997.

*727The Court correctly notes that “once a claimant establishes that he is within the period of recovery for a work-related accident, the burden shifts to the employer to show that a reasonable offer for employment has been made .... ” That is what the employer did in this case. The Commission determined that the position at the Boise guard shack was a reasonable offer of employment. Perkins left that employment for reasons unrelated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Malueg v. Pierson EnterprisesIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API