Perkins v. Croman, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Schroeder
I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which allows Perkins temporary disability benefits for the period from October 16,1996, through March 19,1997.
*727The Court correctly notes that “once a claimant establishes that he is within the period of recovery for a work-related accident, the burden shifts to the employer to show that a reasonable offer for employment has been made .... ” That is what the employer did in this case. The Commission determined that the position at the Boise guard shack was a reasonable offer of employment. Perkins left that employment for reasons unrelated…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Malueg v. Pierson EnterprisesIdaho Supreme Court · 1986