Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Indiana Harbor Belt R.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 18, 1924No. 3301PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAeschueer, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The interrogatories submitted purport to be in accordance with equity rule No. 58, which authorizes parties to a bill in chancery to file interrogatories for discovery from the opposite party of facts and documents material to the support or defense of that action. Here the discovery sought is not in support or defense of the action wherein it is asked, but of a suit at law, and rule 58 does not apply. But the reference to rule 58 may be discarded as surplusage, leaving the inquiry whether the bill, dismissed on appellee’s motion, is under the indicated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baush MacH. Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. H. Wagner & Adler Co. v. MaliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. E. H. Rohde Leather Co. v. Duncan & Sons, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
  4. Matria Healthcare, LLC v. DuthieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API