Legal Opinion

Ohio v. Powell

Columbiana County Court of Common Pleas

Decided October 19, 1971No. Nos. J10197, J10198, J10199, A10788, A10789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobin, J.

The court rules that the constitutional amendment on unlawful searches and seizures does apply to the adults and therefore must meet the law as expressed by the Supreme Court of the United States and Ohio, on the question of illegal searches and seizures.

Coming now to the most important question: does the constitutional amendment against unlawful searches and seizures, apply to the three juveniles, Morris, Lanam and Powell? The Juvenile Act provides that a child cannot commit a crime, but can only become a delinquent child or an unruly child or a traffic violator. The Juvenile Act also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. William G.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fare v. Scott K.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Harvey AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. State v. BlognaOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. David Levell W. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API