Legal Opinion

Webster Manufacturing Co. v. Schmidt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 31, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

It is the duty of the master to use all reasonable care to employ competent and prudent co-employes. Consolidated Coal Co. v. Haenni, 146 Ill. 614.

The negligence charged against appellant involved questions of fact; first, whether the boy employed to operate the steam hammer was or was not immature, unskillful and careless; second, whether, if the boy was incompetent. appellant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care and diligence should have known, that he was not a sufficiently careful and prudent person to be put in charge of such work; third, whether appellee knew, and whether he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coal Co. v. HaenniIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Fraser & Chalmers v. SchroederIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Shively v. HettingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plotkin v. WinklerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  2. Blah v. West Chicago St. Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API