Legal Opinion
Rokowsky v. Finance Administrator
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Sarafite, J.
Petitioner, an owner of real property, sues for a review of the 1970-1971 assessment against his property. The petitioner — both in the application before the tax commission for correction of assessed valuation of real estate, colloquially referred to as the “ protest ” (hereinafter referred to as the application), and in the petition for review filed in *802this court (hereinafter referred to as the petition) — alleges that the assessment of his property located in Bronx County is erroneous on the ground of overvaluation and also on the ground of inequality.
In all tax review cases, a two-step…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Interstate Land Holding Company v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- People ex rel. O'Neil v. PurdyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- 749 Broadway Realty Corp. v. BoylandNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- People ex rel. Irving Trust Co. v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- 1600 Elmwood Avenue, Inc. v. WilesNew York Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Little Falls v. Board of Assessors of SalisburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Gould v. KerwichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976