Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Eaton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewster, J.

Testator’s will was executed September 9,1940. He was then in his eightieth year, a widower, living alone save for his housekeeper, claimant, Maude Baird, who continued in his employ to the time of his death on December 15, 1940, in all, a period of nearly three years, working for wages of two or three dollars a week. The proof is that until his fatal illness of between two and three weeks, testator was ‘ ‘ very active. ’ ’ His estate amounted to about $8,500 personalty in addition to his modest home and its furnishings. He had no descendants. By his will he bequeathed his typewriter, sewing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Worth v. . CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Earl v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Miller v. . McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Yarwood v. Trusts & Guarantee Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Root v. StrangNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomson v. RubensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Accounting of LessordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. In re the Estate of HennelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. In re the Estate of HennelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API