Legal Opinion
Arroyo v. Senkowski
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 1, 2002No. Docket No. 01-2260PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Defendant-petitioner Sergio Arroyo appeals from the April 17, 2001 judgment of the district court denying his petition for habeas corpus made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Arroyo was convicted after a jury trial in state court of three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 220.43(1), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, in violation of N.Y. Penal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ayala v. SpeckardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. John Doe, James RoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Andre Brown v. Robert Kuhlmann, Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Benjamin Gary Triestman, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arroyo v. Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional FacilitySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Young v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Young v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Young v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013