Legal Opinion

Schack v. Trimble

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 6, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

28 N.J. 40 (1958)

145 A.2d 1

KARL SCHACK AND EDNA C. SCHACK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

ROBERT P. TRIMBLE, BUILDING INSPECTOR, & c., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 8, 1958.

Decided October 6, 1958.

Mr. William J. O'Hagan argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Stout & O'Hagan, attorneys).

Mr. Morris Weinstein, Newark, argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Anschelwitz & Barr, attorneys; Mr. Bernard A. Kaminsky of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

Defendant, building inspector of the Borough of Deal,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Ward v. KeenanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Nolan v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API