Legal Opinion

Gossen v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corporation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1973No. 377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court sustained the demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended complaint on the basis that the bus company owed no duty to the plaintiff. Here the plaintiff alighted safely from the bus, in a place of safety, walked around the rear of the bus, and was struck by an oncoming vehicle proceeding in the opposite direction. We affirm.

The duty owed an alighting passenger by the bus company is twofold: (1) To discharge the passenger in a place of safety, and (2) to permit the alighting passenger a reasonable opportunity to get beyond any zone of danger which might subsequently arise by reason of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Downs v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Williams v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Moen v. Madison Railways Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Furrer v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. O'CONNOR v. LarrabeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Victorson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API