Maynard v. Schrumpf's Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oceana; Sullivan, J. Matilda Maynard presented her claim for services rendered against the estate of Caroline Schrumpf, 'deceased. It was disallowed in part by the probate court. Claimant appealed to circuit court. From a judgment for a larger amount, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Mrs. Caroline Schrumpf lived for 17 months or more before her death, at the home of her daughter, Mrs. Matilda Maynard. After the death of Mrs. Schrumpf, the daughter, Mrs. Maynard, presented a claim against her estate for care and board amounting to upwards of $500. The claim was contested. It *495was allowed by the judge of probate in the sum of $39.15, from which allowance an appeal was taken to the circuit court by Mrs. Maynard. The claim was contested in the circuit court. In his charge to the jury the judge stated, when speaking of the claim, in part, as follows:
“It says ‘To card and board/…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sammon v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Bolthouse v. De SpelderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Abel v. RoosenraadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jacobs v. KnoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Galloway v. ScullyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Foote v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re Burg's Estate.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Kaufman v. Kaufman's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.