Legal Opinion

Hardin v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1927No. 17263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. It is incumbent upon a railroad company to exercise due care in the maintenance of a bridge over its tracks along a public highway in a condition safe for travelers passing over the bridge in the exercise of due care.

2. What constitutes such due care upon the part of the railroad company *428will be determined, with reference to any particular condition in the roadway at the approach to the bridge, as a sharp curve in the road at the approach to the bridge, which increases the hazard in the use of the bridge by travelers in vehicles as they turn the sharp curve from the road onto the bridge.

Dec…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Lumley v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Hamilton v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API