Legal Opinion
In Re: Aiping Huang, Debtor, the Bank of China v. Aiping Huang
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2002No. 00-57056PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
Bank of China (the Bank) appeals the judgment of the district court reversing the summary judgment of the bankruptcy court in the Bank’s favor in its suit against Aiping Huang (Huang). Holding that Huang is not collaterally estopped by her settlement with the Bank from denying the Bank’s allegations of fraud, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On October 21, 1996, the Bank brought suit in the district court against SV International, Inc. (SV), ZP Tech Inc. (ZP), Ruigao Trading Inc., Jiannan Zhang, Aip-ing Huang, and Lianping Pan. The Bank noted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hayhoe v. Cole (In Re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Continental Insurance v. Thorpe Insulation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Wank v. Gordon (In Re Wank)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Franchise Servs. of N. Am., Inc. v. U.S. Tr. (In Re Franchise Servs. of N. Am., Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- In Re DB Capital Holdings, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.