Legal Opinion

Hasty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1992No. 91-1725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Earl Jerome Hasty appeals his conviction for purchasing cocaine1 and carrying a concealed weapon,2 complaining of several claimed discovery violations. We conclude that one of these violations compels reversal.

Hasty was charged by information on March 1, 1991 with purchasing cocaine and carrying a concealed weapon. Shortly after he was given substitute counsel, defendant gave notice of his intention to participate in discovery under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(a). Among other things, defendant’s notice asked the state to provide defendant with:

1. The names and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Neimeyer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Neskovski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Griffis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tarrant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API