United States v. Christopher Erwin
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the novel question of what remedy is available to the Government when a criminal defendant who knowingly and voluntarily executed a waiver of right to appeal — and received valuable promises from the Government in return — violates his plea agreement by filing an appeal. Christopher Erwin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute oxycodone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) and 21 U.S.C. § 846. His agreement included a waiver of right to appeal his sentence if it was within or below the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- David Mathias v. Superintendent Frackville SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Cosmo FazioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Kenneth JamesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Abdulrasheed YusufCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- David Mathias v. Superintendent Frackville SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.