Legal Opinion

Itasca Roller Mills v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 1922No. 22,748Published

1Per curiam

Appeal from, an -order of the -municipal court of the city of Minneapolis denying defendant’s -motion to set aside the service of the summons.

The action was brought to recover for the lo-ss in transit of portions -of shipments of grain -made -by plaintiff from Riverdale, Michigan, to Toledo, O'hi-o, and Baltimore, Maryland, over defendant’s line of railway and the lines of connecting -carriers. Service was made upon defendant’s agent, engaged in this state in the solicitation of freight traffic over its lines. Defendant neither owns nor operates a railway in this state and has no office or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rishmiller v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Farmers Co-operative Equity Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API