Legal Opinion
In re Quanitra M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 26, 2000No. AC 19790PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The respondent mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to three of her four minor children.1 On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), need not, in the dispositional phase of a termination proceed*98ing, prove by clear and convincing evidence the seven factors set forth in General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (e), now (d),2 prior to a finding by the court that it is in the best interests of the children…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Christine F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Jones v. IppolitiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Gilbert v. Middlesex HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- In re Jonathon G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Victoria B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- In re Ashley E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Alexander T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.