Rhine v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Davis, J., delivered the opinion of the court: “DECEMBER TERM, A. D. 187S. “ Abraham Rhine, surviving- partner of ) “The United States. “L. Abraham, “W. Penn Clarice, ^ ÑñlÁPA Solicitors.
1Opinion of the Court
RHINE’S MOTION.
On the claimants Motion.
The case was tried at the last term, and is reported in 14 G. Gis. B., 268. A. motion, for a new trial is now made on various (/rounds.
I. A new trial will not be allowed on tho’expectation that a more elaborate discussion may lead to a different result.
II. A new trial will not be allowed because the court omitted to find a fact which, if proven and found, would not control other evidence in the ease.
The Reporters’ statement of the case:
The claimant’s motion is set forth in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Leivis Abraham for the motion.
Like Payan’s Case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boland v. Department of HighwaysWest Virginia Court of Claims · 1982