Legal Opinion
Eckman v. Centennial Savings Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 11, 1987No. 05-86-01181-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McCRAW, Justice.
Carl E. Eckman, Jr., James E. Nicholson, M.D., and Gary Hutchinson, M.D., (appellants) appeal the trial court’s granting of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Centennial Savings Bank (Centennial) in a suit brought under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. sec. 17.45 (Vernon Supp.1987).
In three points of error, appellants urge that the trial court erred in rendering the judgment n.o.v. because: (1) they were “consumers” under the DTPA; (2) the DTPA notice requirement was conclusively established; and (3) the jury verdict was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dowling v. NADW Marketing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Krum v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Hennessey v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Willow Hole Independent School Dist. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Kenneth D. Sorrels and Central Arkansas Livestock Sales v. Texas Bank and Trust Company of Jacksonville, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eckman v. Centennial Savings BankTexas Supreme Court · 1990