Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided February 7, 2011No. Docket No. 8128-09UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK MICHAEL MOONEY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Mooney v. Comm'r

Docket No. 8128-09

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2011-35; 2011 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 35; 101 T.C.M. (CCH) 1153;

February 7, 2011, Filed

Mooney v. Comm'r, 309 Fed. Appx. 675, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 999 (4th Cir., 2009)

Decision will be entered for respondent.

Patrick Michael Mooney, Pro se.

Matthew S. Reddington, for respondent.

WELLS, Judge.

WELLS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WELLS, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's 2005 Federal income tax of $3,614 and additions to tax…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  4. Beaver v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. Otsuki v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wnuck v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  2. Curtis v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  3. Peter E. Hendrickson & Doreen M. Hendrickson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
  4. Nix v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  5. Peter E. Hendrickson & Doreen M. Hendrickson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API