Legal Opinion

Vierczhalek v. MedImmune

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 2020No. 19-0093Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-0093 Vierczhalek v. MedImmune UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. United States Ex Rel. Schumann v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  4. Fair Laboratory Practices Assocs. v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. United States Ex Rel. Paulos v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API