Legal Opinion

Maquar v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1991No. 91-CA-0148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff’s claim for worker’s compensation benefits was dismissed on an exception of prescription. The first issue is whether full pre-injury wages paid to him for light duty constituted “wages in lieu of compensation” which tolled the running of prescription. The other issue is whether the filing of a claim for compensation benefits with the Office of Worker’s Compensation (Office) interrupted prescription of a claim for penalties for retaliatory discharge under the Worker’s Compensation Law.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a streetcar operator. On October 15,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. Morrison, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Vallier v. Oilfield Const. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Carter v. Belle Chasse State SchoolLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Fontenot v. R. LEJEUNE MACH. SHOP & IRON WORKS, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maquar v. Transit ManagementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Krieg v. Krieg Bros. Terrazzo Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Maquar v. Transit Management of Southeast LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API