Legal Opinion

United States v. Nunez-Betancourt

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided February 4, 2011No. 5:10-cr-00069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion to suppress (DE # 18), to which the government has responded and to which response defendant has filed a reply. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), United States Magistrate Judge William A. Webb entered a memorandum and recommendation (“M & R”) wherein he recommended that the court deny defendant’s motion to suppress. Defendant timely filed an objection to the M & R, and the government responded. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nathan L. Chambers v. Greenville County, Greenville County Sheriff’s Office, John Hobart Lewis, Louis Ortiz, James Michael Glass, Jason Owens, Ryan Freeman, Hannah Stouffer, and Walter BrysonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
  2. State v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API