Legal Opinion
Myrtle v. Nevada, C. & O. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
Decided April 22, 1905No. 800PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On Motion to Remand to State Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHawdey, District Judge
(orally). This action was commenced in the state court to recover damages against the defendant for injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff by the negligence, carelessness, and failure of defendant to provide suitable couplings on its cars.
*194The motion to remand is based upon several grounds: (1) The action is not subject to removal under the statutes of the United States; (2) it was not removed within the time required by the statutes of the United States; (3) the petition upon which said order of removal was made does not state any legal grounds authorizing the removal; (4) the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Shoshone Mining Co. v. RutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
- Nelson v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1909