Legal Opinion
In re Fialuridine ("FIAU") Products Liability Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 3, 1995No. Misc. No. 94-0365; No. MDL 1034PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
I. Background.
This case comes before the court on defendant Eli Lilly and Company’s (“Lilly’s”) motion for a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Previously, *387plaintiffs requested, and the court ordered, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, the production of various documents pertaining to FIAU that were in the hands of Lilly’s foreign affiliates. These documents, estimated by the parties to number close to one thousand, exist only in Italian, German, Japanese, and French.
Lilly filed this motion seeking a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Puerto Rico Electric Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Lam Quy v. Air America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Celanese Corporation & Fiber Industries, Inc. v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Rosado v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- East Boston Ecumenical Community Council, Inc. v. MastrorilloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nature's Plus Nordic A/S v. Natural Organics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011