Legal Opinion
City of Eugene v. Crooks
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 30, 1981No. 16-79-04405, CA 19329PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
The City of Eugene (plaintiff) brought this suit under ORS 30.315 to enjoin violation of its zoning ordinance and the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. Defendants Crooks (defendants) appeal from the decree entered against them, claiming that they are victims of unlawful discrimination in the enforcement of plaintiffs ordinances and that the decree was improper, because it grants relief which is not requested in the complaint or justified by their stipulations.
Plaintiffs zoning ordinances permit duplexes on certain sized corner lots in R-l Single Family zones. In 1968, plaintiff approved a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. L. A. Witherill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Medford Assembly of God v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- City of Portland v. BitansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984