Legal Opinion
Hinchman v. Local Union 130 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 1, 1974No. 6023PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORIAL, Judge.
We reverse.
Any cause of action th.at the petitioner might have under state law has been preempted by federal law because the action complained of arguably falls within the purview of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) which is exclusively administered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
This suit for damages and lost wages was filed on May 15, 1968 as a result of petitioner’s lack of employment between approximately September 27, 1967 until January 8, 1968. The petitioner, Marshall Hinchman, sought damages from Local 130 of the International Brotherhood of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. HardemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lutz v. Jefferson Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Succession of Velasquez-BainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Co. v. DogaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Allied Workers Local Union No. 53 v. PaternostroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hinchman v. Local Union 130 International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974