Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Director, Patuxent Institution
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 11, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, District Judge.
Petitioner seeks the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, contesting the validity of his confinement in Patuxent Institution as a defective delinquent.
Petitioner has made two previous applications to this Court, and numerous applications to courts of the State of Maryland. The statement of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in his latest state application, Monroe v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 230 Md. 650, 187 A.2d 873 (1963), sets forth much of the history of petitioner’s efforts to obtain an adjudication on the merits of the points that he raises. He was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bush v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- McDonald v. BoslowDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
- Davis v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976