Legal Opinion

Henry v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 23, 2004No. 2003-CC-02454-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KING, C.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. George Henry appeals, pro se, from the denial of unemployment benefits and asserts the following assignment of error, which we quote verbatim:

I. The circuit court failed to implement a ruling based on the law as render [sic] by the supreme court of the state of Mississippi (South Central Bell v. MESC, 357 So.2d 312, 1978) held that employees who elect to take the leave of absence option are not unemployed within the meaning of the law. The employer can not be arbitrary and must be clear and straight forth [sic] with the employee.

*740STATEMENT OF FACTS

¶2. George Henry…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. BD. OF ANIMAL HEALTHCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
  2. South Cent. Bell Tel. v. Miss. Employment SEC. Comm.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mickle v. MISS. EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Owens v. Mississippi Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API