Haiduk v. Nassar

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, in which the defendants appealed from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silberman, J.H.O.), dated December 5, 1988, and that judgment was affirmed by decision and order of this Court dated November 12, 1991 (Haiduk v Nassar, 177 AD2d 545), the parties were directed to appear before this Court to be heard on the issue of the imposition of appropriate sanctions and costs, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 against the appellants for their conduct in making frivolous motions to this Court.