Legal Opinion

Martin v. Bush

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1858Published

1Opinion of the Court

Weight, J.,

delivered tibe opiniou of the Court:

This action is founded upon tbe following instrument,

“Nashville, Nov. 1856.
“One day after date, I promise to pay R. B. Cartte-*159man or bearer, Eive hundred and ten dollars in Masonry work, at customary prices. Value received. Witness my hand this day above. Chas E. MARTIN.”

The question is, has there been any breach of contract. If so, when and to what extent was the plan-tiff entitled to recover ? At common law it was not incumbent upon the plaintiff to designate the place where the Masonry work should be done, as a condition precedent to its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamb v. LathropNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  2. Johnson v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Barr v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  4. Currier v. CurrierSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1819

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API