Raleigh City Limits, Inc. v. Sandman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in concluding that defendants did not waive their right to declare the lease in default on the grounds that the August 1978 rent, and succeeding month’s rent, was not timely paid. In Winder v. Martin, 183 N.C. 410, 411, 111 S.E. 708, 709 (1922), the Supreme Court stated:
It is the generally accepted rule that if the landlord receive rent from his tenant, after full notice or knowledge of a breach of a covenant or condition in his lease, for which a forfeiture might have been declared, such constitutes a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Winder v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Office Enterprises, Inc. v. PappasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by1 opinion
- Community Housing Alternatives, Inc. v. LattaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987