Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Krolak (Et Al.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1948No. Appeals, 210, 211 and 212PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Fine, J.,,John Dougherty, appellant, who was thrice convicted of assault and battery on separate trials on three indictments, 1 relies for reversals on the refusal of the trial judge to grant continuances in cases No. 47 and No. 53, February Sessions,, 1948, on trial errors in the reception of testimony offered by the Commonwealth in rebuttal in No. 48 February Sessions, 1948, the case hirst tried, and in reception at trial of No. 47 of admissions made by certain defendants in a former trial.. We are all of the opinion that there was ample evidence to support the verdicts, that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. HouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Commonwealth v. SchurtzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth v. ChalfaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. RouchieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. BurdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth v. BarnhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. RansomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API