Legal Opinion

Whitt v. City of St. Louis

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided December 4, 2020No. 4:18-cv-01294Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DAVID WHITT, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 4:18-CV-1294 RLW CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of St. Louis’s (“City”) Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (ECF No. 82). The City seeks a protective order limiting Plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1)(D). Plaintiff David Whitt (“Plaintiff”) opposes the Motion and it is fully briefed. After careful consideration of the motion papers, the Court will…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API